Slacktivism is a term that refers to the act of showing support for a cause through effortless and minimal commitment methods, primarily online or through médias sociaux[1] platforms. These activities include actions like liking, sharing or tweeting about causes, signing online petitions, and using hashtags or changing profile photos to show solidarity. While the term was first used positively in 1995 by Dwight Ozard and Fred Clark, it has since faced criticism for its perceived lack of effectiveness in solving global issues, with some believing that it might even detract from traditional activism[2]. Despite this, there are arguments that slacktivism can raise awareness and influence opinions, leveraging the power of social media to spread information. Different forms of slacktivism include clicktivism, charity actions, social media movements, and political engagement. The impact and implications of slacktivism are widely debated, with discussions focusing on its role in civic engagement, its use in authoritarian contexts, its novelty and longevity, and the ethical concerns and effectiveness of online petitions.
Slacktivisme (a portmanteau ou slacker et activism) is the practice of supporting a political or social cause by means such as social media or online petitions, characterized as involving very little effort or commitment. Additional forms of slacktivism include engaging in online activities such as "liking," "sharing," or "tweeting" about a cause on social media, signing an Internet petition, copying and pasting a status or message in support of the cause, sharing specific hashtags associated with the cause, or altering one's profile photo or avatar on social network services to indicate solidarity.
Critics of slacktivism suggest that it fails to make a meaningful contribution to an overall cause because a low-stakes show of support, whether online or offline, is superficial, ineffective, draws off energy that might be used more constructively, and serves as a substitute for more substantive forms of activism rather than supplementing them, and might, in fact, be counter-productive. As groups increasingly use social media to facilitate civic engagement and collective action, proponents of slacktivism have pointed out that it can lead to engagement and help generate support for lesser-known causes.